Have the Muslims Sold Us a Bill of Goods?:

Moral Equivalency Applied to Islamic History

 

By Eric V. Snow

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

 

HAVE MUSLIMS AND ACADEMIC LIBERALS WHITEWASHED ISLAMIC HISTORY? ……………………………………………………………………………….4

 

CHAPTER 1

 

WERE MEDIEVAL MUSLIMS REALLY TOLERANT WHEN JUDGED BY MODERN STANDARDS?

 

MEDIEVAL MUSLIM LEVELS OF RELIGIOUS TOLERATION EXAGGERATED.. 5

CASES WHEN MEDIEVAL MUSLIMS PERSECUTED THE JEWS. 6

SPECIAL DISCRIMINATORY TAXES IMPOSED ON NON-MUSLIMS BY MUSLIMS. 7

TRADITIONAL CHRISTIANS SUFFERED UNDER ISLAMIC RULE ALSO.. 8

THE MYTH OF ISLAMIC “TOLERANCE” FOR RELIGIOUS MINORITIES. 9

DID THE DHIMMIS IN CYPRUS LIVE PEACEABLY UNDER TURKISH RULE?. 10

IS THERE ISLAMIC TOLERANCE IN AFGHANISTAN?. 11

HOW FREE DO MODERATE MUSLIMS FEEL ABOUT SPEAKING OUT?. 11

DO MUSLIMS CONDEMN THEIR EXTREMISTS’ ATROCITIES ENOUGH?. 12

 

CHAPTER 2

THE HISTORICAL  AND TEXUAL ORIGINS OF THE LITERAL DEFINITION OF “JIHAD”

 

 

DOES MUSLIM TEACHING ON JIHAD ONLY GO BACK TO IBN TAYMIYA?. 13

HOW MANY BATTLES DID MUHAMMAD HIMSELF PARTICIPATE IN?. 20

DOES THE OLD TESTAMENT’S WARFARE EXCUSE JIHAD TODAY?. 20

KHOMEINI CITES THE QURAN’S PRO-JIHAD STATEMENTS. 21

DOES THE MUSLIM DOCTRINE OF JIHAD MAKE MUSLIM NATIONS LESS PEACEFUL?. 23

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER 3 

 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IMPERIALISM, CONQUEST AND EXCUSE-MAKING:  WHY ARE JIHADS GOOD, BUT CRUSADES EVIL?

 

IS MUSLIM AGGRESSION WRONG ALSO?. 25

SHOULD MUSLIMS BE TOLD TO FORGET PAST MISTREATMENT BY CHRISTIANS?. 26

HAVE THE MUSLIMS ALWAYS BEEN VICTIMS OF WESTERN AGGRESSION?. 27

WESTERN IMPERALISM AS PAYBACK FOR EARLIER JIHADS BY TURKS AND ARABS. 29

MUSLIM ARMIES ALSO COMMITTED ATROCITIES. 31

IS SOMEBODY’S IMPERIALISM OR CONQUEST MORALLY SUPERIOR TO SOMEONE ELSE’S?. 33

IS THERE A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON (REVERSING THE RESULTS OF)  IMPERIALISM?. 34

WERE THE WESTERN IMPERIALISTS REALLY LESS IGNORANT THAN THE MEDIEVAL MUSLIM JIHADISTS?. 36

HOW AN IMPERIALIST POWER CAN DESTROY FUTURE CRITICISMS OF ITS ACTIONS! 37

DOES IGNORANCE EXCUSE BOTH WESTERN AND ISLAMIC CIVILIZATIONS?. 38

THE WEST DISCOVERS SOLUTIONS TO ITS COLLECTIVE SINS. 39

ARGUMENTS THAT WHITEWASH ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION’S SINS ALSO WOULD EXCUSE THE WEST’S. 41

WHY A “CULTURAL” EXPLANATION DOESN’T EXCUSE ISLAM AS A RELIGION FOR OPPRESSING WOMEN.. 41

WHEN A RELIGION’S ADHERENTS ACT OUT OF NON-RELIGIOUS ECONOMIC OR POLITICAL MOTIVES, IS THEIR FAITH GUILTLESS THEN?. 48

 

CHAPTER 4

THE IDEOLOGICAL EXPLANATION FOR WHY ISLAMIC CIVILIZATION PRODUCES DISPROPORTIONATELY MORE WAR AND TERRORISM COMPARED TO OTHER CIVILIZATIONS

 

WHY ARE MISTREATED MUSLIMS MORE VIOLENT ON AVERAGE THAN OTHER MISTREATED PEOPLE?. 51

WHY DOES PALESTINE PRODUCE MORE TERRORISM THAN TIBET?. 53

IDEOLOGY, NOT SOCIOLOGICAL VARIABLES, EXPLAIN WHY MUSLIMS TURN TO TERRORISM MORE OFTEN THAN OTHER MISTREATED PEOPLE. 55

WHY DOESN’T WESTERN MEDIA DECADENCE CAUSE CHRISTIAN TERRORISM?. 56

DO POVERTY, OPPRESSION, UNEQUAL INCOMES, ETC., EXPLAIN WHY WESTERN MUSLIMS TURN VIOLENT?. 57

THE GREATER IDEOLOGICAL SOURCES FOR MUSLIM TERRORISM... 58

THE IDEOLOGICAL REASONS WHY AMERICAN TROOPS STATIONED IN SAUDI ARABIA SO PROVOKE MUSLIMS. 61

INCONSISTENCIES IN PRACTICE DIFFER FROM STRICTLY FOLLOWING IDEOLOGY.. 63

THE INTRINSIC TENDENCY OF SECULAR MUSLIM GOVERNMENTS TO BECOME LESS TOLERANT OVER TIME AS THEY BECOME MORE ISLAMIC.. 64

SAMUEL HUNTINGTON ON THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS:  THE WEST VERSUS ISLAM... 65

ARE ISLAMIC SOCIETIES MORE APT TO GO TO WAR?. 66

STATISTICAL, EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FOR ISLAM’S “BLOODY BORDERS”. 67

 

CHAPTER 5

 

IS THE WEST’S IMPERIALISM AND THE OPPRESSION OF MUSLIMS THE MAIN CAUSE OF ISLAMIST TERRORISM?

 

WHAT IS AMERICA HATED FOR?  HER VIRTUES OR HER FLAWS?. 70

DOES SWIFT AND SURE RETALIATION DETER TERRORISM?. 73

RELIGIOUS IDENTITY MORE IMPORTANT FOR MUSLIMS THAN NATIONAL ONE. 74

HOW MUCH TERRORISM DOES LATIN AMERICA EXPORT TO AMERICA?. 74

AMERICA IS CONDEMNED FOR BOTH SUPPORTING AND OVERTHROWING MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS. 76

WHAT IS THE CORRECT DEFINITION OF “TERRORISM”?. 77

HOW MUSLIM THREATS VERSUS LIBERALS PAY OFF. 78

IS SELF-DETERMINATION THE ULTIMATE POLITICAL VALUE? 

 

 

CHAPTER 6

IS ZIONISM THE MAIN CAUSE FOR ISLAMIC TERRORISM?

 

HOW LETTING THE PALESTINIAN ARABS RESETTLE AMONG ARABS WOULD HAVE MOSTLY SOLVED THE PROBLEM... 84

HOW A LACK OF FORGIVENESS HOLDS BACK MUSLIMS, PALESTINIANS. 89

DID THE JEWS INTENTIONALLY ETHNICALLY CLEANSE THE ARABS?. 89

DOES CURSING ISRAEL TODAY CAUSE ARAB MUSLIMS TO BE CURSED?. 91

MARK TWAIN’S DESCRIPTION OF A DESOLATE HOLY LAND IN 1867. 92

THE PROBLEM WITH THE NATIVE-ILL-USE-OF-LAND ARGUMENT. 93

DO THE OPPRESSED SIN BY REBELLING AGAINST THEIR OPPRESSORS?. 94

DOES GOD USE PEOPLE WHO SIN TO ACCOMPLISH HIS OVERALL WILL?. 96

TO FULFILL PROPHECY, SOME ARABS HAD TO BE DISPLACED BY JEWS. 97

 

CHAPTER 7

HOW TO AVOID USING UNSOUND ARGUMENTS ABOUT ISLAM’S ROLE IN CAUSING VIOLENCE HISTORICALLY AND PRESENTLY

 

THE ARGUMENT FROM AUTHORITY USED AGAINST OPPONENTS OF ISLAM... 99

AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS THAT INSULT OPPONENTS ARE ALSO UNSOUND.. 102

HOW HISTORICALLY ACCURATE IS WHY I AM NOT A MUSLIM?. 103

HOW RELIABLE IS THE TESTIMONY OF MUSLIM FOREIGN STUDENTS?. 104

IS CONDEMNING ISLAM EVER “RACIST”?. 107

IS SELECTIVE RACIAL PROFILING OF MUSLIM ARAB AMERICANS WRONG?. 107

BRITISH PUBLIC OPINION POLLS DOCUMENT MUSLIM RADICALISM... 107

 

CHAPTER 8

 

CAN ONE CIVILIZATION BE OBJECTIVELY SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER?

 

 

IF THE MEDIEVAL WEST WAS OBJECTIVELY INFERIOR TO THE ISLAMIC WORLD, IS IT OBJECTIVELY SUPERIOR TODAY? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .110

SHOULD HUMAN GOVERNMENTS GIVE PEOPLE THE FREEDOM TO VIOLATE GOD’S LAW?. 116

GOD’S POSSIBLE INTERVENTION IN ANY NUMBER OF POSSIBLE TURNING POINTS IN OTHER CIVILIZATIONS. 117

COULD HAVE THE MONGOLS SO EASILY CONQUERED THE WEST?. 118

SO CAN A DOUBLE STANDARD BE DEFENDED AFTER ALL?. 119

MORALLY JUDGING BY USING THE SAME YARDSTICK.. 120

 

 

APPENDIX:  IS THE QURAN THE WORD OF GOD?

 

THE RATIONAL CASE AGAINST THE QURAN’S INSPIRATION

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

INTRODUCTION

 

HAVE MUSLIMS AND ACADEMIC LIBERALS WHITEWASHED ISLAMIC HISTORY?

 

            Is Islam is a religion of peace?  It is standard, politically correct rhetoric to claim so.  But does Islamic history really bear this out?  Do Muslims condemn (successful) acts of imperialism in their own history as much as (say) liberal western intellectuals condemn European and American imperialism in recent centuries?  Or is Western imperialism singularly morally condemned because it acted last (and most successfully)?  Why does the American liberal and cultural elite apparently fear (say) the American Religious Christian Right working through normal democratic processes politically more than militant Islam’s terrorism, even after 9-11?  Why should medieval Catholic Crusaders or Western Imperialists be more condemned than when Arab and Turkish Muslims invaded and took over vast areas via jihads?  Indeed, why are jihads good, but crusades evil?  Aren’t all holy wars really equally unholy?  Are Muslims historically merely the passive victims of Western and Christian imperialism?  Or were they aggressors once themselves, and later paid the price for their aggression?  In this essay, the case will be made that many intellectuals and historians have whitewashed Islam’s history while blackening the Christian West’s by comparison when the same moral standards are applied to both civilizations.

CHAPTER 1

 

WERE MEDIEVAL MUSLIMS REALLY TOLERANT WHEN JUDGED BY MODERN STANDARDS?

 

MEDIEVAL MUSLIM VS. CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS TOLERATION