Links to elsewhere on this Web site:
/apologetics.html /book.html /doctrinal.html /essays.html /links.html
/sermonettes.html /webmaster.html
For the home page, click here:
/index.html For the history page : /newfile1.html
Is the theory of evolution true?
/Apologeticshtml/Darwins
God Review.htm
Why does God Allow Evil? Click
here: /Apologeticshtml/Why
Does God Allow Evil 0908.htm
Is Christian teaching from ancient paganism? /Bookhtml/Paganism
influence issue article Journal 013003.htm
Which is right?: Judaism or
Christianity? /Apologeticshtml/Is
Christianity a Fraud vs Conder Round 1.htm
/Apologeticshtml/Is
Christianity a Fraud vs Conder Round 2.htm
Should God’s existence be proven? /Apologeticshtml/Should
the Bible and God Be Proven Fideism vs WCG.htm
Does the Bible teach blind faith?
/doctrinalhtml/Gospel
of John Theory of Knowledge.htm
Does Islam cause terrorism? /Apologeticshtml/Moral
Equivalency Applied Islamic History 0409.htm
IS THE BIBLE HISTORICALLY RELIABLE?
By Eric V.
Snow
For many decades, various
liberal higher critics have maintained
the Bible is largely a collection of Hebrew myths and legends, full of historical inaccuracies.
But thanks to archeological
discoveries and further historical research in more recent decades, we now know this liberal viewpoint is false. Let’s consider the following evidence:
The existence
of King Sargon of the ancient empire of Assyria, mentioned in Isaiah 20:1, was dismissed by higher critics in the early 19th century.
But then archeologists unearthed his palace at
Khorsabad, along with many inscriptions about
his rule. As the Israeli historian Moshe Pearlman wrote in Digging Up the Bible:
"Suddenly, sceptics who had doubted the
authenticity even of the historical parts of the Old Testament began to revise
their views."
The Assyrian King Sennacherib was
assassinated by two of his sons (II Kings 19:36-37),
according to the Old Testament. But various historians doubted the Bible's account,
citing the accounts by two ancient Babylonlans--King Nabonidus and the
priest named Berossus—who said only one son was involved,.
However, when a fragment of a prism
of King Esarhaddon, the son of Sennacherib, was discovered, it confirmed the Bible's version of the story. The historian
Philip Biberfeld commented in his Universal
Jewish History: "It (the
Biblical account) was confirmed in all the minor details by the inscription of
Esar-haddon and proved to be more
accurate regarding this even than the Babylonian sources themselves. This
is a fact of utmost importance for the evaluation of even contemporary sources not in accord with Biblical tradition."
Likewise, some
historians doubted the existence of Pontius Pilate, the Procurator of Judea who had had Jesus of Nazareth crucified (Matt. 27; John
18-19). But then, in 1961, an archeological
expedition from Italy overturned a stone used as a
stairway for a Roman theater in ancient Caesarea. This rock was inscribed with
a Latin inscription saying (here it is in English): "To the people of
Caesarea Tiberium Pontius Pilate Prefect of Judea." As Michael J. Howard
said in the Baltimore
Sun of March 24, 1980:
"It was a fatal blow to the doubts about Pilate's existence. For the first time there was contemporary
epigraphic evidence of the life of
the man who ordered the crucifixion of Christ."
Similarly, the great 19th-century
archeologist Sir William Ramsay was a
total skeptic about the accuracy of the
New Testament, particularly the Gospel of Luke. But
as a result of his topographical study of, and archeological research in, Asia
Minor (modern Turkey), he totally changed his mind. He commented after some 30
years of study: "Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy . . . this
author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians."
In the
nineteenth century it was frequently argued that Moses couldn't have written the Pentateuch because writing didn't exist in his day (c. 1400
b.c.) This was
the basis for the documentary hypothesis (“JEPD theory,”) which maintained anonymous editors and writers wrote the first five books of the Bible hundreds of years after the time of Moses. But the excavations of cities in Mesopotamia
(modern Iraq) have decisively smashed such suppositions about the lateness of
writing’s development. For example, the city of Ebla, which first began to be unearthed in 1964, was at the
height of its power in 2300 b.c.,
and destroyed in 2250 b.c. Some 17,000
tablets with writing have been
unearthed at this site since 1974, which showed writing existed a thousand years before Moses in the case of this one city
alone.
The New Testament also has much
manuscript evidence in favor of its accuracy, for two reasons: 1) There are far more ancient manuscripts of it than for any
other document of the pre-printing using moveable type
period (before c. 15th century A.D.) 2) Its
manuscripts are much closer in date
to the events described and its original writing than various ancient
historical sources that have often
been deemed more reliable. It was originally written between 40-100 A.D. Its earliest complete manuscripts date from
the fourth century A.D., but a
fragment of the Gospel of John goes
back to 125 A.D. (There also have been
reports of possible first-century fragments). Over 24,000 copies of portions of
the New Testament exist. By contrast, consider how many fewer manuscripts and how much greater the time gap is between the
original composition and earliest extant copy (which would allow more scribal errors to creep in) there are for
the following famous ancient authors and/or works: Homer, Iliad,
643 copies, 500 years; Julius Caesar, 10
copies, 1,000 years; Plato, 7 copies, 1,200 years; Tacitus, 20 or fewer copies,
1,000 years; Thucycides, 8 copies, 1,300 years.
Unlike Hinduism and Buddhism, which are religions of mythology and metaphysical speculation, Christianity is a religion founded on historical fact. It’s time to start being more skeptical of the skeptics’ claims about the Bible (for they have often been proven to be wrong, as shown above), and to be more open-minded about Christianity’s being true.
Click
here to access essays that defend Christianity: /apologetics.html
Click here to
access essays that explain Christian teachings: /doctrinal.html
Click here to
access notes for sermonettes: /sermonettes.html
Why does God
Allow Evil? Click here: /Apologeticshtml/Why Does God Allow
Evil 0908.htm
May Christians
work on Saturdays? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Protestant Rhetoric
vs Sabbath Refuted.htm
Should
Christians obey the Old Testament law? /doctrinalhtml/Does the New Covenant
Abolish the OT Law.htm
Do you have an
immortal soul? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Here and
Hereafter.htm
Does the
ministry have authority? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Is There an Ordained
Ministry vs Edwards.html
Is the United
States the Beast? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Are We the Beast vs
Collins.htm
Should you give
10% of your income to your church? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Does the Argument
from Silence Abolish the Old Testament Law of Tithing 0205 Mokarow rebuttal.htm
Is Jesus God?
Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Is Jesus God.htm
Will there be a
third resurrection? Click here: /doctrinalhtml/Will There Be a Third
Resurrection.htm
Links to
elsewhere on this Web site: /apologetics.html /book.html /doctrinal.html /essays.html /links.html
/sermonettes.html /webmaster.html For the home page, click here: /index.html For the history page : /newfile1.html